投资者律师博客法院驳回了被告对Poptech LP阶级证券欺诈诉讼中的首席原告地位的挑战bob200体育
美国康涅狄格州地方法院拒绝了被告管家投资顾问有限责任公司和马龙·昆（Marlon Quan）对任命Poptech LP为首席原告的挑战集体证券欺诈bob200体育诉讼由投资者提起。原告正在指责投资公司和Quan违反了联邦证券法反禁令，据称该基金将采用某些投资策略。bob200体育该基金还被指控将大部分资产投资于托马斯·佩特斯（Thomas Petters）经营的庞氏骗局。Poptech提起班级证券诉讼后不久，发表了通知bob200体育业务线指出没有争议的通知适当地将拟议班的成员通知有关待处理的行动和所谓的课程期。
In their challenge, the defendants argued that the notice did not satisfy Private Securities Litigation Reform Act requirements, including failing to completely and “adequately” notify proposed class members of all the claims asserted in the complaint, not providing enough details about the defendants’ alleged misrepresentations, and failing to “adequately facilitate” additional action and inquiry by potential members. The court, however, found that the PSLRA requires just a “reasonably detailed summary” of claims made.
Shepherd Smith Edwards＆Kantas Ltd LLP创始人和bob200体育证券欺诈律师威廉·谢泼德（William Shepherd）关于这一裁决的话：“如果该法院的裁决幸免于难，这可能对证券欺诈的受害者有帮助。bob200体育一些法院在发现甚至可以开始之前就将“以特殊性为特殊性恳求证券欺诈”。bob200体育同样，尽管这些诉状要求适用于集体诉讼，但许多法官一直在所有类型的证券诉讼中都需要荒谬的诉状要求。bob200体育希望根据恳求技术，将来将更少的欺诈投资者脱离法院。”