Former SEC Commissioner Wants SEC Shareholder Proposal Process Revamped

Ex-Securities and Exchange Commissioner Paul Atkins wants the agency to rework its shareholder proposal rule, including the process that the staff employs to determine when issuers can leave the proposals out of their proxy materials. Atkins pointed to the recent increase in shareholder proposals that are pressing companies to reveal their political spending even though the majority of shareholders oppose such resolutions. He spoke against special interest groups using these proposals to push their agendas.

阿特金斯在接受BNA采访时发表了评论。Referring to the no-action process that lets SEC staff figure out the major issues that end up on issuers’ proxies for shareholders to vote on, he said that this action was very subjective and doesn’t have much transparency, actual due process, or accountability.

Under the SEC’s 1934 Securities Exchange Act Rule 14a-8, its shareholder proposal rule, the procedures that eligible investors can have their proposals included in the proxy materials of a company are laid out. The rule also lets issuers leave out proposals in certain, limited situations. (Still, issuers have to tell the SEC Division of Corporation of Finance why the proposal is being left out) and the staff can then grant no-action relief.

Just a couple of years ago, the Commission was reviewing the US proxy voting system’s inner workings. On July 14, 2010, the regulator put out a concept release seeking public comment on the transparency, accuracy, and efficiency of the voting process. (Recommendations that the shareholder proposal process be modified have been making their way through the SEC on numerous occasions in the last three decades.)

Still, supporters of the shareholder proposal process stand by it, believing that it is a key communication channel between shareholders and corporations. Also, considering all the changes coming down under the JOBS Act and the Dodd-Frank Act, they don’t think that now is the time to tinker with it.

Institutional Investor Securities Fraud
AtSSEK Partners Group, ourbob200体育证券律师have decades of combined experience in securities law and the securities industry. We represent institutional and individual investors and clients that “opt out” of class actions. Ourinstitutional investment fraud law firm代表公司，高净值个人，合作伙伴，私人基金会，银行，慈善组织，金融公司，市政当局，大型信托，学区，退休计划以及其他持续影响数百人甚至数千个人的变电站损失的人。

Shepherd Smith Edwards and Kantas, LTD, LLP seeks to recover damages and losses sustained from negligence, securities fraud, and other illegal and improper actions committed by financial firms and/or their representatives in the investment and sale of financial instruments and the management of investors assets. Your case assessment with us is a free, no obligation consultation.

Related Web Resources:
Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Final Rule: Amendments to Rules on Shareholder Proposals, SEC

More Blog Posts:
Congress Regulates the Securities Regulators, Stockbroker Fraud Blog, April 30, 2013

SEC Commissioner Aguilar Calls For the Abolishment of Mandatory Arbitration Agreements，股票经纪人欺诈博客，2013年4月21日

联邦记录法诉讼寻求使SEC重建约9,000条与执法有关的文件被驳回，机构投资者证券博客，2013年2月5日bob200体育