标记的文章Tibble V. Edison International

美国的最高法院刚刚使工人更容易起诉其401k计划，以收取投资费用过高。案件是Tibble诉Edison International，美国最高法院一致裁定爱迪生国际的前工人。

The plaintiffs contended that the plan fiduciaries’ decision to choose six retail-class mutual funds (out of the forty selected for the retirement plan) was based on the higher fees that these funds charged, compared to institutional class funds that were also allegedly available to investors. Under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), retirement plans that are sponsored by an employer have a fiduciary obligation to choose investments that are appropriate and remove any that cease to meet the criteria set up in the investment policy statement.

五年前，美国加利福尼亚州中部地区法院对原告判处了370,732美元的判决，该判决涉及涉及相关零售股票的三项基金的高额费用。针对其他三项资金的索赔是向美国第9巡回上诉法院和现在最高法院的索赔。